Solving Prostitution Part II

[info_box_3 title=”Update…“]

This all started because I read a petition that used sensationalism over substance to achieve a visceral reaction to gain a signature for a petition. A member of the Pacific Alliance to Stop Slavery told me that he agrees with me that the law DOES undisputedly contain a a way to detain juveniles without criminalizing them.

But that part of the petition remains unchanged. Which means they still choose pretty fiction over uncomfortable fact.

[/info_box_3]

Earlier this week I sat down with the Pacific Alliance to Stop Slavery. After explaining everything to them, After their representative saying they AGREE with me on my point about the law, they amended a PART of their petition (to something that is still wrong). But the first sentence of their petition is still WHOLLY A LIE. It’s absolutely not true. I showed EXACTLY where in the law they can “detain juveniles without criminalizing them”, and they prefer to keep it as the lead in their petition. Probably because it is effective. It is only effective to people who don’t know what the law reads.

Basically there have three responses once they are made aware:

      1. “Marcus, we won’t change it because you read the law wrong. HERE IS WHY you read the law wrong, HERE IS WHERE the law says something different than what you say.”
      2. “Marcus, you read the law right, so we will change the petition to be intellectually honest.”
      3. “Marcus, its a great pitch, why should we change it?

      Guess which they’re going with so far? Change it to be honest with the people you’re attempting to convince. They’ll quote you, they’ll then get corrected. Then they’ll blame you for leading them on..

      (and the one edit they did make is wrong, here is the correct chart of the park closure vs. prostitution punishments:)

      wpid-548666_457289240975801_310775165_n-2012-10-5-00-30.jpg

      Intellectually disingenuous.

      (more…)

      Continue Reading
      Close Menu